Facebook Ads Relevance Score: What It Is and How to Fix It
Facebook Ads Relevance Score: What It Is and How to Fix It
If your Facebook Ads are costing more and delivering less, your relevance scores may be the culprit. Meta replaced the original single Relevance Score in 2019 with three diagnostic metrics that give you more precise feedback on ad performance. Understanding what these scores mean, how they are calculated, and what to do when they are low can significantly reduce your CPMs and improve overall campaign efficiency.
What Happened to the Original Relevance Score?
From 2015 to 2019, Meta showed a single Relevance Score from 1 to 10 on each ad. In April 2019, Meta retired this metric and replaced it with three more actionable ranking scores that evaluate different dimensions of ad performance separately.
The three replacement metrics are:
- Quality Ranking: How your ad's perceived quality compares to ads competing for the same audience
- Engagement Rate Ranking: How your ad's expected engagement rate compares to ads competing for the same audience
- Conversion Rate Ranking: How your ad's expected conversion rate compares to ads with the same optimization goal competing for the same audience
Each metric uses the same scale: Above Average, Average, Below Average (Bottom 35% of ads), or Below Average (Bottom 20% of ads).
Where to Find Your Relevance Rankings
- Go to Meta Ads Manager
- Navigate to the Ads level (not campaign or ad set level)
- Click Columns, then Customize Columns
- Search for "Quality Ranking," "Engagement Rate Ranking," and "Conversion Rate Ranking"
- Add all three to your view
You can only see these metrics after your ad has received sufficient impressions (typically 500 or more). New ads will show "N/A" until enough data is collected.
Why Relevance Rankings Matter for Your ROAS
Meta's auction system does not simply award ad placements to the highest bidder. The auction uses Total Value, which combines your bid, estimated action rates (the probability someone completes your desired action), and ad quality.
An ad with poor quality and engagement rankings has a lower Total Value, which means it either:
- Wins fewer auctions, leading to delivery issues
- Must bid higher to win the same placements, raising CPM
- Gets shown to lower-quality audiences that Meta's algorithm determines are more tolerant of lower-quality content
The practical result: two campaigns with identical budgets and targeting can have wildly different CPMs simply because one has better relevance rankings. Higher relevance = lower effective CPM = more results for the same spend.
Meta's own data shows that improving your relevance rankings from Below Average to Above Average can reduce CPM by 50% or more in competitive auctions.
Understanding Each Ranking Metric
Quality Ranking
This metric reflects how Meta assesses the quality of your ad relative to others competing for the same audience. Quality signals include:
- Engagement signals: saves, shares, and positive feedback relative to impression volume
- Negative feedback: users hiding your ad, reporting it as spam, or selecting "I don't want to see this"
- Clickbait and sensationalism detection: Meta penalizes ads that use misleading headlines or artificially inflate engagement
- Landing page quality: slow load times, excessive ads on landing pages, or content mismatch between ad and destination page
- Creative quality signals: low-resolution images, excessive text overlay on images, and poor production quality all negatively affect this metric
A Below Average Quality Ranking almost always means one of three things: the ad creative is weak, the audience is wrong for the offer, or the landing page experience is poor.
Engagement Rate Ranking
This metric compares your ad's expected engagement rate to other ads competing for the same audience. Engagement includes clicks, reactions, comments, shares, video views, and other interactions.
Below Average Engagement Rate Ranking usually points to a creative problem. The ad is not stopping the scroll, not communicating value clearly, or not compelling people to take any action whatsoever. This is the most direct signal that your creative needs to be replaced.
Conversion Rate Ranking
This metric compares your expected conversion rate to other ads with the same optimization goal competing for the same audience. It is the most consequential metric for direct-response advertisers.
A Below Average Conversion Rate Ranking with otherwise acceptable Quality and Engagement Rankings suggests the problem is post-click: your landing page, offer, or checkout experience is failing to convert interested users. You are getting clicks but not conversions.
This diagnostic distinction is valuable. When your Conversion Rate Ranking is poor but Engagement is fine, do not change your creative. Fix your funnel.
How to Fix Below Average Quality Ranking
Refresh the creative. This is the most common fix. Test new images, video, and copy. A creatively fatigued audience generates more negative feedback and fewer positive signals, dragging quality down.
Tighten audience-creative alignment. If you are running a creative designed for fitness enthusiasts to an interest audience that includes casual health content readers, the mismatch shows up in quality signals. Ensure your creative speaks directly to the audience it is targeting.
Improve landing page experience. Run your landing page through Google's PageSpeed Insights. Fix slow load times (target under 3 seconds on mobile). Remove excessive popups, interstitials, or ad units that Meta's algorithm flags as poor user experience.
Reduce sensationalism and clickbait. Headlines like "You won't believe what happened" or "This one weird trick" trigger Meta's spam detection algorithms. Write honest, clear, specific headlines that accurately reflect what the user will see after clicking.
How to Fix Below Average Engagement Rate Ranking
Test new hooks. The first 3 seconds of a video or the primary visual of a static image determines whether someone stops scrolling. Test radically different hooks: a provocative question, a relatable pain point, a surprising statistic, a bold visual contrast.
Add more compelling CTAs. A clear, urgent, specific call-to-action in both the creative and the copy drives engagement. "Download now," "See how it works," and "Get your free analysis" outperform generic "Learn more" CTAs.
Test video format. Video ads consistently generate higher engagement rates than static images across most audiences. If you are running only static ads and your Engagement Ranking is low, test video.
Reduce text overlay on images. Meta's algorithm has historically penalized images with more than 20% text coverage. Keep text minimal on static images.
How to Fix Below Average Conversion Rate Ranking
Audit your landing page with fresh eyes. Is the offer clear immediately on landing? Is there a single, obvious call-to-action? Is the page mobile-optimized? Does the landing page match the promise in your ad?
Shorten your conversion path. Every additional step between ad click and conversion reduces completion rate. If possible, use Lead Ads that capture information without leaving Meta, or reduce form fields on landing pages.
Check your Pixel and Conversions API setup. If Meta's algorithm is not receiving accurate conversion signals (due to iOS blocking or Pixel misconfiguration), your Conversion Rate Ranking is calculated on incomplete data. Implement the Conversions API to restore signal quality.
Test different conversion events. If you are optimizing for Purchase but generating fewer than 50 conversions per week, the algorithm does not have enough data to learn. Move to Add to Cart or Initiate Checkout temporarily to build conversion volume, then switch back to Purchase once you have consistent data.
The Relationship Between Relevance Rankings and Creative Fatigue
Relevance Rankings are dynamic. An ad that launches with Above Average rankings will see those rankings decline as frequency increases and the audience becomes saturated. Monitoring your ranking metrics weekly lets you catch creative fatigue before it causes significant CPM increases.
The workflow: when any ranking drops to Below Average, treat it as a signal to rotate creative or refresh your audience, not a reason to pause the campaign. The underlying offer and structure may still be sound; the creative is simply tired.
How Adwise Surfaces Relevance and Quality Issues
Monitoring relevance rankings across multiple ads, ad sets, and campaigns manually is time-consuming and easy to miss. Adwise reviews your full Meta account daily and flags relevance ranking declines as part of its campaign health scoring. When an ad moves from Average to Below Average on any metric, you see it in your daily recommendations with a specific recommended action.
Instead of discovering a relevance problem after it has been draining budget for a week, you get a heads-up the day the signal changes, with context on which metric declined and why it matters for your specific account.
Stop Letting Poor Relevance Scores Kill Your ROAS
Adwise monitors your Meta Ads account daily and flags exactly which ads are showing relevance issues, quality drops, and engagement declines, before they compound into expensive problems.
Try Adwise free, setup in 60 seconds
No credit card required. First recommendations arrive within 24 hours of connecting your account.